Skip to content
YuzhaLink

YuzhaLab

Where aquatic knowledge becomes tested, documented, and turned into reliable systems.

YuzhaLab studies water quality, equipment behavior, automation logic, livestock care, and the way real aquatic environments actually behave — then turns what we learn into YuzhaLink products, solutions, and platform logic.

A test tank under observation at YuzhaLab.

A test tank under observation at YuzhaLab.

From the lab

Selected work, not a feed.

A small set of pieces that best show how we think — chosen for depth over volume. More arrives as the lab keeps running.

7 Aquarium Parameters You Should Monitor Daily

Knowledge

7 Aquarium Parameters You Should Monitor Daily

Five-minute daily checks of temp, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen, ATO, ammonia and equipment prevent tiny issues turning deadly.

Infographic evaluating a UAS algae box in a 20 L aquarium: the black box unit mounted on a tank rim with red LEDs lit, a treatment-versus-control setup diagram, a measured spectrum with a dominant red peak, a one-week water-quality table, and trend charts showing nitrate falling from 10.8 to 5.8 mg/L (46% removal) while phosphate drops to 0.06–0.09 mg/L.

Review

Nitrate and Phosphate Removal by a UAS Algae Box in a 20 L System

A UAS algae box — an enclosed algae scrubber with internal algae screens and its own LED lighting — was run against a no-box control in matched 20 L tanks for one week. Nitrate in the treatment tank fell from 10.8 mg/L to 5.8 mg/L, about 46%, while the control drifted between 9.5 and 11.2 mg/L with no downward trend. Phosphate fell much faster, from 0.63 mg/L to 0.06 mg/L within a day, then drifted back up to 0.18 mg/L mid-week before easing to 0.09 — most likely phosphorus released as algal debris and surface deposits broke down. The practical consequence is that the screens have to be harvested on a schedule: left to accumulate, the box begins returning nutrients it removed earlier. One treatment tank and one control, six sampling points across seven days, and a single pump flow of 265.6 L/h — trend data, not a validated removal rate.

Filter media data

Standardized Quantitative Characterization of Aquarium Filter Media

Four protocols measure aquarium filter media separately instead of reducing it to one surface-area figure: what the material releases or removes over seven days of static immersion (FM-WC), how much particulate it sheds under aeration (FM-PS), how readily water passes through its saturated body (FM-HC), and its mercury-intrusion pore structure down to a 0.5 μm entrance throat (FM-MIP). Surface area is not a directly observed constant — the value moves with the method, the probe, the assumed pore model, the size range and the normalization basis, so every figure published here carries all five and its protocol version. Each protocol runs three independent specimens, traceable from product through acquisition lot, physical unit and specimen to the individual run. None of the four measures nitrification capacity, colonized biofilm area, or how much media a tank needs; those need biological challenge tests and long-term validation this protocol does not attempt.

Infographic titled "How to remove chlorine from aquarium water": a tap running into a planted aquarium, callouts for free chlorine and chloramines and for reduced nitrifying-bacteria activity, and four numbered dechlorination methods — air exposure with sunlight and aeration, activated carbon, vitamin C, and sodium thiosulfate.

Research

Removing Residual Chlorine from Aquarium Tap Water: Harm to Fish and Nitrifiers, and Four Dechlorination Methods

Tap water leaves the treatment plant carrying at least 0.3 mg/L of residual chlorine and reaches the end of the distribution network at 0.05 mg/L or more — enough to damage fish gills and to inhibit ammonia-oxidising bacteria, the part of the nitrification system least able to spare them. This article reviews that harm, then measures how quickly three approaches actually clear it. Activated carbon was by far the quickest: 200 g in 36 L took residual chlorine from 0.61 mg/L to zero in 35 minutes. Standing under indoor light alone was the slowest — three samples starting near 0.58 mg/L still held 0.02 mg/L after 4 hours 38 minutes. Adding aeration helped but inconsistently: one sample was down to 0.06 mg/L within 80 minutes while the other two tracked the light-only curves. Vitamin C and sodium thiosulfate are covered by principle only and were not measured here. The measured curves live in the figures rather than in the text, and the runs differ in starting concentration and volume, so read them as timescales rather than as a head-to-head ranking.

Infographic summarising a quality evaluation of Artemia salina nauplii from four commercial brands: a bar chart of mean salinity (A 15.0‰, B 9.0‰, C 6.3‰, D 8.7‰), a four-panel microscopy inspection reporting no parasites, and a table of bacterial counts from 1.6×10⁵ to 5.9×10⁵ CFU/mL, beside frozen blister packs of brine shrimp.

Review

Comparative Evaluation of Artemia salina Nauplii from Four Commercial Brands: Salinity, Parasites and Bacterial Load

Four commercial brands of Artemia salina nauplii were tested for salinity, parasites and bacterial load. No parasites were found in any brand, so the basic sanitary claims hold up. But every brand carried bacteria of the same order of magnitude — from 1.6×10⁵ CFU/mL for the lowest to 5.9×10⁵ CFU/mL for the highest — suggesting that "fully disinfected" marketing does not survive storage and transport. Salinity varied more than expected, from 15‰ down to 6.3‰, and the lowest-salinity brand also showed heavy chorion residue and visible blank ice, pointing to high water content and incomplete processing. At the dilution actually used when feeding, the salt added to tank water is negligible. Three replicates per brand, cultivable bacteria only, and brands are anonymised as A–D.

The YuzhaLab method

An aquarium is one system — not a shelf of devices.

Water chemistry, oxygen, temperature, filtration, microorganisms, plants, animals, lighting, equipment, and your decisions all influence one another. Change one, and the rest respond.

Water chemistry
Oxygen
Temperature
Filtration
Microorganisms
Plants
Animals
Lighting
Equipment
Human decisions

We do not add Wi-Fi to a heater and call it smart. We observe how the whole system behaves over time, document what we find, and turn experience into logic that repeats — so the result does not depend on any one person remembering the right thing at the right moment.

From lab to system

How observation becomes something you can run.

Research only matters if it changes what we build. So everything the lab learns flows directly into the YuzhaLink ecosystem — shaping which products ship, how they behave by default, and what we recommend. This is why YuzhaLab is not a separate content brand. It is the knowledge source behind every YuzhaLink product, platform decision, and solution.

Product decisions

Which features ship, and which ideas the data quietly killed.

Automation rules

The thresholds and routines our controllers run by default.

Alert strategies

What's worth interrupting you for — and, just as important, what isn't.

Recommended setups

Tested configurations you can copy instead of guessing.

YuzhaMatrix templates

Solution blueprints for stores, breeders, and public systems.

Stay close to the work

The lab keeps running. Follow along.

New research, guides, and videos as they are published — plus the product and platform decisions they lead to.